Antitrust policy
By participating in the Summit on Existential Security, you agree to:
Read and follow this antitrust policy
Understand your individual responsibility to comply with all applicable antitrust laws.
Introduction
Antitrust law promotes full and fair competition, benefiting consumers through:
Lower prices
Increased output
Better service
Faster innovation
Over 120 countries, including the U.S., have antitrust laws (often called competition laws). While many collaborations among competitors can be legal and procompetitive, they can violate antitrust laws without proper safeguards. Violations can result in severe penalties, including large fines and even imprisonment for companies and individuals.
Purpose of this policy
The Summit on Existential Security (the "Summit") brings together researchers from academia, think tanks, government, labs that may compete, and other fields to share ideas and updates that might help to reduce existential risk.
Antitrust compliance is the responsibility of every participant of this Summit.
This policy outlines basic antitrust guidelines for summit participants. It is not exhaustive and supplements your employer's policies. Consult your own legal counsel for any specific concerns or questions.
Note: Effective Ventures Foundation (UK) and Effective Ventures Foundation USA, Inc., as organizers of the Summit, assume no responsibility for ensuring that participants’ discussions are appropriate and not in violation of any antitrust, competition, or other related laws.
Participant responsibilities
Permitted discussions
Participants may discuss:
Public policy positions
Advocacy efforts
Thinking on research and safety issues
Other areas not prohibited below
Prohibited discussions and agreements
Do not share competitively sensitive information (or any other information identified below)
Do not discuss or share competitively sensitive information (i.e., information that would generally not be shared among competitors). The exchange of competitively sensitive information among competitors can lead to allegations, investigations, and sometimes prosecutions for price fixing and other antitrust violations. If competitively sensitive information is intentionally exchanged by competitors through a third party, it can also lead to price fixing and other antitrust violations.
Avoid discussing or sharing information regarding any of the following for any product or service that an organization or other entity offers:
Non-public pricing, licensing terms, terms of sale
Employee salaries and benefits or contractor compensation
Confidential research agendas or areas of focus
The amount of investments or expenditures on research and development, materials, or infrastructure
Bidding for contracts or RFPs with the U.S. or a foreign government(s), other companies, or other entities
Product strategies, plans or development roadmaps
Pricing and marketing strategies
Market shares
Hiring talent or recruiting talent from other participants
Customer lists or advertising strategies
Whether to do business with any company or any government or other entity
What business actions to take in response to particular actual or potential regulations, policies, legislation or court decisions
Do not discuss or propose anticompetitive agreements
Avoid discussing or proposing any of the following for any product or service it offers:
Agreements not to do business with any company or government or other entity
Agreements to allocate contracts or customers to particular companies
Agreements not to compete for government contracts or contracts with other companies or the terms of any bids
Agreements on prices, how to set prices, licensing terms or terms of sale
Agreements to coordinate product strategies, plans or roadmaps
Agreements on compensation for employees or contractors
Agreements not to hire or recruit talent from other participants
Agreements to reduce, limit or scale back research, product development, innovation or other competitive efforts of any kind
Agreements on business decisions that would be made in response to particular regulations, policies, legislation or court decisions
Do not agree on prices or output (price or output fixing)
Agreements among competitors on price or output are always unlawful, meaning that the agreements cannot be defended or justified. The agreement itself is illegal, even if it has no effect on price or output.
"Price" is interpreted very broadly and includes:
Wholesale, retail and suggested prices for goods and services (including salaries, benefits and wages for employees or independent contractors)
Price ranges
Pricing formulas
Discount, rebate, warranty and credit terms
Minimum advertised prices ("MAP")
Reference prices (e.g., using one price as a take-off point for other prices)
Price increases or decreases
Margins
"Output" includes factors like:
Actual or proposed production or changes in production
Downtime in production
Agreements to limit innovation or set quality also may be illegal.
Do not agree to allocate customers or territories
Agreements among competitors to allocate, divide or assign customers, territories, products, or services are also per se illegal.
Agreements between an input supplier and a downstream seller to limit that downstream seller to certain customers or a defined territory are treated differently under the antitrust laws; however, downstream sellers cannot agree on allocations among themselves and have the manufacturer or upstream provider adopt them.
Do not agree to boycotts or refusals to deal
Agreements among competitors to boycott certain suppliers, customers or competitors are illegal when they are designed to achieve economic advantages for the boycott participants.
In the trade association context, restrictions on membership and participation in shows or exhibitions, disciplinary proceedings, and standard-setting activities may also create antitrust issues and should be discussed and reviewed with your own legal counsel.
General guidance
Assume all communications are discoverable in an investigation or lawsuit. This includes documents, emails, text messages, and similar messaging, as well as discussions.
Don't write anything you wouldn't want to see on the front page of major newspapers.
If discussing a competitively sensitive topic, consider whether the discussions could be misconstrued by the person in the conversation or someone hearing only part of it.
If in doubt whether a conversation or topic complies with the antitrust laws, stop the discussion and consult your own legal counsel.
Remember
Antitrust compliance is every participant's responsibility. This policy helps clarify your obligations, but it's not comprehensive. Always err on the side of caution and seek legal advice when uncertain. The exchange of competitively sensitive information among competitors can lead to allegations, investigations, and sometimes prosecutions for price fixing and other antitrust violations.